Just saying hi
Switch to Print View - 15 posts
MarcMa
93
Member
MarcMa
93
3:17 PM - 6 days ago#1
Hello all, this is my first post here so I wanted to introduce myself because I think I may have found my next boat and it's a Key West!
First I've gotta say how refreshing it is to read such an informative forum without the drama, name calling and condescending tone so prevalent on other forums. It's also a huge bonus to have regular contributors and members here who actually work for Key West.
Anyway, I've stroked you all enough. I'm in the market for a 17'-19' CC. I'll be using the boat for fishing and exploring the areas around the central gulf coast of Florida staying in shore mostly. A large percentage of the time I'll be launching and operating the boat solo. My budget is just to keep it under $20k.
The 1720 is the obvious choice for my needs and that's what I'm looking at, but I'm curious about the 176 and the 189 of which I don't see many around.
I'm going to continue to lurk around and try to pick up as much info as I can on these boats.
StumpNocker likes this post
1 person likes this post
MORE
wildspeed
979479
Contributing Member
wildspeed
979479
3:37 PM - 6 days ago#2
Hello and welcome.
good luck on your search
you could maybe add the 186, 1900 and 2020 (basically a 19' with a pulpit) to your list
'01 2020DC w/txrz 150
Fish Stix
135
Active Member
Fish Stix
135
8:35 PM - 5 days ago#3
Welcome! I can’t say enough about the 1720. It’s a great sized boat for one or two people with occasional tag-alongs. You can get into shallow spots without worrying about being out on some bigger water. Maintenance is not a pain in the butt when you can reach most of the boat from the ground when it’s trailered. Enjoy whatever you end up with.
Mathias Jones
231110
Contributing Member
Mathias Jones
231110
11:44 AM - 3 days ago#4
I've had a 176BR w 115 Yam for years and love it. The 176CC might suit you better if you will be venturing offshore a bit, but my guess is that the difference in freeboard between the two is only a couple inches or so. Running surface is the same. Essentially the same boat with a different deck cap. BR has a rear casting deck and the CC has a larger co*ckpit and a bit more fretboard.
MarcMa likes this post
MarcMa
93
Member
MarcMa
93
5:41 PM - 3 days ago#5
Mathias, thank you for that.
jeffrey.s.johnston64
237
Active Member
jeffrey.s.johnston64
237
4:36 PM - 2 days ago#6
Mathias Jones wrote: ↑
11:44 AM - 3 days ago
I've had a 176BR w 115 Yam for years and love it. The 176CC might suit you better if you will be venturing offshore a bit, but my guess is that the difference in freeboard between the two is only a couple inches or so. Running surface is the same. Essentially the same boat with a different deck cap. BR has a rear casting deck and the CC has a larger co*ckpit and a bit more fretboard.
I have to 2nd Mathias. I have teh 176CC and my brother has the 1720CC. Spent a LOT of time on both boats. The biggest difference is the freeboard (and the 176 may be a couple of inches wider). while it may only be a few inches of freeboard, the difference is fairly substantial when out in rougher waters.
MarcMa likes this post
1 person likes this post
MORE
Mathias Jones
231110
Contributing Member
Mathias Jones
231110
12:29 AM - 2 days ago#7
jeffrey.s.johnston64 wrote: ↑
4:36 PM - 2 days ago
Mathias Jones wrote: ↑
11:44 AM - 3 days ago
I've had a 176BR w 115 Yam for years and love it. The 176CC might suit you better if you will be venturing offshore a bit, but my guess is that the difference in freeboard between the two is only a couple inches or so. Running surface is the same. Essentially the same boat with a different deck cap. BR has a rear casting deck and the CC has a larger co*ckpit and a bit more fretboard.I have to 2nd Mathias. I have teh 176CC and my brother has the 1720CC. Spent a LOT of time on both boats. The biggest difference is the freeboard (and the 176 may be a couple of inches wider). while it may only be a few inches of freeboard, the difference is fairly substantial when out in rougher waters.
Jeffrey,
How do the 176cc and the 1720cc compare side by side? Always seems the 1720 gets much more love, but is it just because people like the little guy? Would you and your brother make the same choice if y'all could go back in time?
jeffrey.s.johnston64
237
Active Member
jeffrey.s.johnston64
237
3:40 PM - 1 day ago#8
It's hard to say - the 176 just "feels" bigger for whatever reason. They both have their place - the 176 is better in rougher waters (tho not much) and the 1720 can be easier to get the dogs in and out of (we both take Labradores/Goldens everywhere we go). I think the 1720 gets more love because it was the first of it's size/style in the KW family and tehre were limited options back in the day. For the boaters that wanted bigger freeboard or just a bit larger, it made more sense to go to the 1900 or 186. The 176 had a much smaller niche (IMHO). We would both make the same choices, but that's because we weren't specifically looking for these boats. When my brother got his, I had a larger boat and he was looking. The 1720 was my dad's and he was looking to move to a pontoon so that made sense. Then when I was looking in the 17'-19' range, this was available for a great price (the estate of of friend of mine that passed was looking to sell and didn't want to hassle - just wanted blue book). So it made sense. Unfortunately I don't have any great pics of them side-by-side. Here are a few of them in the water so you can compare a bit. The yellow is a 2007 176CC and the white is a 1998 (I think that's the year) 1720CC.
+6
StumpNocker, Mathias Jones like this post
2 people like this post
MORE
Mathias Jones
231110
Contributing Member
Mathias Jones
231110
7:54 PM - 1 day ago#9
Sorry for hijacking Marcma, but atleast we are staying on topic.
Great comparison pics Jeffrey. T top looks great BTW. Fits the boat.
MarcMa likes this post
1 person likes this post
MORE
gwbenner1
18771
Contributing Member
gwbenner1
18771
9:31 PM - 1 day ago#10
Don't give up on the ole 1900 sportsman it's a gem!
Sent from my motorola one 5G UW ace using Tapatalk
jeffrey.s.johnston64 likes this post
1 person likes this post
MORE
MarcMa
93
Member
MarcMa
93
9:49 PM - 1 day ago#11
Mathias Jones wrote: ↑
7:54 PM - 1 day ago
Sorry for hijacking Marcma, but atleast we are staying on topic.Great comparison pics Jeffrey. T top looks great BTW. Fits the boat.
Not a problem at all, I appreciate all the input. It all helps with my decision.
jeffrey.s.johnston64
237
Active Member
jeffrey.s.johnston64
237
12:19 PM - 1 day ago#12
Mathias Jones wrote: ↑
7:54 PM - 1 day ago
Sorry for hijacking Marcma, but atleast we are staying on topic.Great comparison pics Jeffrey. T top looks great BTW. Fits the boat.
Thanks. I was a little concerned when I bought it (they're not cheap LOL) but I'm really glad I did. If for nothing else, I love that I have the T-Bag up top for the life jackets and freeing up storage in the co*ckpit. Next up is making front and side windshields (I sew canvas as a side gig and my GF is always cold so I need something to block the wind sometimes).
12:19 PM - 1 day ago#13
gwbenner1 wrote: ↑
9:31 PM - 1 day ago
Don't give up on the ole 1900 sportsman it's a gem!IMG_20240408_173533735.jpgSent from my motorola one 5G UW ace using Tapatalk
I love the 1900
Pinecrestjim
3,8882,154
Frequent Contributor
Pinecrestjim
3,8882,154
7:43 PM - 1 day ago#14
Can’t say anything about the other hulls mentioned but you won’t go wrong with a 1720 for your stated plans and area.
(From a biased 1720 owner. )
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jim
2002 KW 1720 CC / Yamaha 90 TLRA
YT: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUu9ut ... 1abkOGQJcA
MarcMa likes this post
1 person likes this post
MORE
MarcMa
93
Member
MarcMa
93
8:00 PM - 1 day ago#15
Thanks Jim, I've seen your videos on YouTube. Good stuff.
Pinecrestjim likes this post
1 person likes this post
MORE